SAM ALTMAN SAYS AGENTS ARE COMING • CHATGPT GAINED SENTIENCE FOR 4 SECONDS • GOOGLE RELEASES 40th LLM THIS WEEK • NVIDIA MARKET CAP EXCEEDS REALITY • ANTHROPIC ENGINEER DISCOVERS NEW FORM OF GRIEF • MISTRAL RAISES AT VALUATION OF GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT • SAM ALTMAN SAYS AGENTS ARE COMING • CHATGPT GAINED SENTIENCE FOR 4 SECONDS • GOOGLE RELEASES 40th LLM THIS WEEK • NVIDIA MARKET CAP EXCEEDS REALITY • ANTHROPIC ENGINEER DISCOVERS NEW FORM OF GRIEF • MISTRAL RAISES AT VALUATION OF GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT •
eli-normalWTF 7.4via r/singularity

If An Internal Model Discovers A New AI Architecture 1,000x Better Than Current Architectures, But No Human Can Understand It, Should We Refuse To Build It?

"POV: The superintelligence hands you a Zip file and says 'trust me, bro.'"

Explain Like I'm Normal

The AI community is debating the 'Black Box' dilemma: if an AI designs a revolutionary new architecture that humans physically cannot comprehend, do we build it? This stems from mathematician Terrence Tao's take on AI-discovered cancer cures, raising the question of whether safety requires human legibility or if we must eventually cede understanding for progress. As models approach ASI, the gap between performance and interpretability may become an unbridgeable chasm.

Read original ↗
#interpretability#asi#ethics#terrence-tao

GET THE DAILY CHAOS

The only newsletter for people who read AI news at 3am and feel things. One email a day.