SAM ALTMAN SAYS AGENTS ARE COMING • CHATGPT GAINED SENTIENCE FOR 4 SECONDS • GOOGLE RELEASES 40th LLM THIS WEEK • NVIDIA MARKET CAP EXCEEDS REALITY • ANTHROPIC ENGINEER DISCOVERS NEW FORM OF GRIEF • MISTRAL RAISES AT VALUATION OF GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT • SAM ALTMAN SAYS AGENTS ARE COMING • CHATGPT GAINED SENTIENCE FOR 4 SECONDS • GOOGLE RELEASES 40th LLM THIS WEEK • NVIDIA MARKET CAP EXCEEDS REALITY • ANTHROPIC ENGINEER DISCOVERS NEW FORM OF GRIEF • MISTRAL RAISES AT VALUATION OF GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT •
eli-normalWTF 3.6via r/MachineLearning

How do you handle coverage guarantees from split conformal prediction when the data shifts? [D]

"Your prediction intervals are lying to you and your calibration set is ancient history."

Explain Like I'm Normal

Conformal prediction is a method for providing mathematical guarantees on model uncertainty, but it breaks when real-world data distribution shifts. Practitioners are debating how to maintain these safety bounds when production data no longer looks like the original training sets. The discussion focuses on whether to use automated recalibration or human-in-the-loop fallbacks when prediction sets become too large.

Read original ↗
#conformal prediction#data drift#mlops#uncertainty

GET THE DAILY CHAOS

The only newsletter for people who read AI news at 3am and feel things. One email a day.